Pain : LidoPAIN® BP
Pain : LidoPAIN® BP

Clinical Development

EpiCept initiated a placebo-controlled dose-response Phase IIa clinical trial in the U.S. In this clinical trial, the Company tested two dosage formulations of LidoPAIN BP (70mg or 140mg Lidocaine) compared to placebo. Each patch was applied once daily for three days to 43 subjects with acute muscular skeletal lower back pain of at least moderate intensity. Subjects abstained from other analgesics and other therapeutic regimens.

The primary endpoint for this trial was pain intensity measured by a 5-point numerical pain scale where 0 indicated no pain and 5 indicated severe pain. Pain measurements were made at various times over the three-day duration of the trial. EpiCept assessed a number of secondary endpoints, including pain relief, muscle stiffness and global satisfaction. The trial demonstrated a dose-related statistically significant reduction in back pain intensity and muscle stiffness as well as increase in pain relief from the initiation of the trial.

LidoPAIN® BP Placebo-Controlled Dose-Response

In January 2002, EpiCept initiated a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase IIb clinical trial in three centers in the U.S. In this clinical trial, the Company tested a LidoPAIN BP patch measuring 150 sq. cm. with a 19.0 percent concentration of lidocaine. Each patch was applied once daily for three days to 198 subjects with acute lower back pain of at least moderate intensity. Subjects abstained from other analgesics and other therapeutic regimens.

Although the results at two of the three centers in this study did indicate that LidoPAIN BP had a greater analgesic effect as compared to the placebo control, the results at a third center were contradictory. At that center, the trial subjects who received placebo reported an analgesic effect that exceeded the analgesic effect reported by the subjects receiving LidoPAIN BP. After the trial, an EpiCept consultant concluded that the unusually large placebo effect reported at this center most likely resulted because many of the subjects may have been concerned that a failure to report an analgesic effect would result in a loss of the stipend offered as compensation for participation in the trial. Due to the results reported at this center, this clinical trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant analgesic effect.